24-25

Triggered avalanche in Taylor Fork

Taylor Fork
Southern Madison
Code
HS-AM
Elevation
9070
Aspect
N
Latitude
44.94420
Longitude
-111.28500
Notes

Snowmobile triggered slide in Taylor Fork today from above cutting across. Nobody caught. 2.5 feet deep 150 feet wide

Number of slides
1
Number caught
0
Number buried
0
Avalanche Type
Hard slab avalanche
Trigger
Snowmobile
Problem Type
Persistent Slab
Slab Thickness
30.0 inches
Slab Width
150.00ft
Snow Observation Source
Slab Thickness units
inches
Single / Multiple / Red Flag
Single Avalanche
Advisory Year

Triggered avalanche in Taylor Fork

Date
Activity
Snowmobiling

Snowmobile triggered slide in Taylor Fork today from above cutting across. Nobody caught. 2.5 feet deep 150 feet wide

Region
Southern Madison
Location (from list)
Taylor Fork
Observer Name
L Bernard

GNFAC Avalanche Forecast for Sat Mar 22, 2025

Snowpack and Avalanche Discussion

<p>In the mountains around Cooke City, Island Park, and West Yellowstone, including the Southern Madison and Southern Gallatin Ranges, strong winds will drift recent snow, loading slopes where triggering <strong>wind slab avalanches </strong>that break 1-2 feet deep<strong> </strong>are likely. Continued snowfall and increasing winds will exacerbate this instability today. On Thursday, snowmobilers in Island Park reported that drifted snow and cornices cracked and collapsed easily on test slopes (<a href="https://www.mtavalanche.com/node/34706"><span>observation</span></a&gt;). Avoid steep terrain where active drifting, cornices and shooting cracks indicate instability. Select slopes sheltered from the wind—often found at middle and low elevations where the trees block the wind—for safer avalanche conditions.</p>

<p>In the Lionhead area, and Southern Madison and Southern Gallatin Ranges, weak layers buried in late January continue to result in infrequent <strong>persistent slab avalanches</strong>. The most recent slide in the Taylor Fork occurred Wednesday and broke 2-4 feet deep (<a href="https://www.mtavalanche.com/node/34697"><strong><span>details</span></s…;). These layers have not resulted in avalanches in the Centennial Range, but snowmobilers assessing for instability noted a weak layer buried two feet deep below a melt-freeze crust that broke and propagated in unstable test results. Manage the problem of avalanches failing on persistent weak layers by selecting less consequential terrain (smaller slopes with fewer terrain traps) and following safe travel practices (beacon, shovel, probe, and traveling one at a time on steep slopes). Testing for instability can reduce, but will not eliminate, the chances of a surprise.</p>

<p>The danger is CONSIDERABLE on wind-loaded slopes and MODERATE on all others.</p>

<p><span><span><span>Windy conditions in the mountains around Bozeman and Big Sky will cause the limited snow available for transport to drift into slabs that could avalanche on steep slopes. The terrain immediately below cornices and on upper-elevation slopes loaded by west and southwest winds is the most likely area to trigger a <strong>wind slab avalanche</strong>, breaking 6 inches to a couple of feet deep. On Wednesday, a skier was caught and carried 100 feet down a steep slope south of Bridger Bowl, serving as a poignant reminder of the power of a relatively small slide (<a href="https://www.mtavalanche.com/node/34703"><strong><span>details and video</span></strong></a>). Yesterday in Beehive Basin, Ian recommended identifying and avoiding wind-loaded slopes and digging down a couple of feet to test for instability, reducing the chances for surprises if you are considering travel in steeper terrain (<a href="https://www.mtavalanche.com/node/34715"><strong><span>observation and video</span></strong></a>). Shooting cracks and recent avalanche activity are the most precise indicators of instability. </span></span></span></p>

<p><span><span><span>Seek out terrain sheltered from the wind where avalanche conditions are generally safe, and slides are unlikely. The danger is MODERATE on wind-loaded slopes and LOW on all others. </span></span></span></p>

No drifts in the new snow

Date
Activity
Skiing

Took a quick trip up Beehive Basin to the prayer flags, down into the meadows towards Bear Basin and returned the way we came.

Found around 4" of new snow from yesterday. There were scoured areas near the ridgeline on the west face, but we didn't find any cohesive wind drifts.

We dug two quick pits on the east facing terrain dropping towards Bear Basin. In our upper pit (NE aspect, 9200 ft), we found a layer of small facets (1 mm) buried a foot down, under the snow that has fallen in the past week. It didn't react in our Extended Column Test (ECTN25), but we hadn't had any reports of these facets previously, so it was a little bit surprising. We dug again, a little lower (~8900) to see if we would find it again, but it didn't exist in that location (instead there was a stout melt-freeze crust under this weeks snow). 

There was a thin, breakable, melt-freeze crust under yesterday's 4" of new snow on any slope that wasn't a little shaded. Slopes with a northward tilt, or in the shade of trees, didn't have the breakable crust. 

Despite high clouds, the snow surface was starting to get damp in the early afternoon and there were roller balls beneath our ski tracks. We saw a fresh wet loose slide on an low elevation west facing slope in Bear Basin.

Otherwise, we saw no signs of instability. 

Region
Northern Madison
Location (from list)
Beehive Basin
Observer Name
Ian Hoyer

Unstable test result Centennial range

Date
Activity
Snowmobiling

From text message: “I was out with a friend and his 2 daughters. We were east of Jefferson 8990’ elevation.  East aspect ECTP 22. Down 78cm from surface. Melt freeze  layer I would describe as breaking up??  garbage.”

Region
Island Park
Location (from list)
CENTENNIAL RANGE
Observer Name
Kevin Allred